Quality adjustments that move the number

Lesson 3 of 10 · 8 min read

Once you have a base multiple from comps, adjust for quality. The discipline of writing down each adjustment with a reason is what separates a defensible valuation from a gut-feel guess.

Premium adjustments (+0.5x to +1.5x or more, additive):

- >95% recurring, predictable cash flow, easier financing
- <3% annual churn, lower replacement cost, easier hold
- Premium accounts, high-ticket residential or commercial with stable budgets
- Tight geographic density (e.g., 2–4 zip codes for a 50-stop route), higher margin
- >90% auto-pay, lower collections risk
- Transferable software, contracts, brand, turnkey premium
- Trained, retained tech with non-compete, owner-removable operations

Neutral / flat:

- Average density, average billing mix, average documentation, no unusual strengths or weaknesses

Discount adjustments (−0.5x to −2x or more):

- High churn (>10%), replacement cost is real
- Scattered geography, drive time eats margin
- Owner-dependent operations, buyer has to stay in the truck or hire fast
- Weak documentation, buyer absorbs risk during transition
- Aging or unincluded equipment
- Heavy concentration in a single account or zip code
- Unresolved complaints, license issues, or pending litigation
- Off-platform / cash revenue, discount or exclude entirely
- Property tied to the home (truck garaged at owner's house with no separate insurance, etc.), administrative friction

Be specific about magnitude. "+1.0x for 96% recurring + auto-pay + zero churn over 24 months" is defensible. "+1.0x because it feels good" is not.

Worked example. Base comp multiple: 11.5x. Subject route attributes:
- 96% recurring auto-pay → +1.0x
- 3% trailing 24-month churn → +0.5x
- Tight density (3 zip codes) → +0.5x
- Owner-dependent (no SOPs, owner is the only tech) → −1.0x
- Aging truck included at $15k value, realistic value $9k → handle separately by reducing equipment allocation, not the multiple

Adjusted multiple: 12.5x trailing recurring revenue. Equipment: separately negotiated.

If trailing recurring is $14k/month → recurring portion: $14k × 12.5 = $175,000. Equipment: $9,000. Total deal value: ~$184,000.

Buyers and sellers both respect a number that's built from line items, not gut feel. This is also the format that holds up in negotiation, every line is a defensible position.

Quick check

1. Quality adjustment for high recurring %?
2. Quality adjustment for documented systems and SOPs?
3. Quality adjustment for scattered, low-density routes?
4. Quality adjustment for premium average ticket?
5. Most defensible way to present adjustments?
6. Match the quality adjustment to its multiple impact.
Earn 45 points
Mark this lesson complete